<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: NSURLCache Joke / iPhone</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/</link>
	<description>Marcus Rohrmoser mobile Software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 10:24:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Scott Logic &#187; A Webapp By Another Name II &#8211; The many pitfalls of using the application cache on mobile platforms</title>
		<link>http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-21697</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Logic &#187; A Webapp By Another Name II &#8211; The many pitfalls of using the application cache on mobile platforms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/#comment-21697</guid>
		<description>[...] iOS in such a way that it will fail silently. This has been widely reported e.g. here, here and here. Obviously without disk caching of the resources, as soon as your app is closed (or at any time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iOS in such a way that it will fail silently. This has been widely reported e.g. here, here and here. Obviously without disk caching of the resources, as soon as your app is closed (or at any time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: A Webapp By Another Name II &#8211; The many pitfalls of using the application cache on mobile platforms &#124; Chris&#039;s Excellent Adventure In JavaScript</title>
		<link>http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-19577</link>
		<dc:creator>A Webapp By Another Name II &#8211; The many pitfalls of using the application cache on mobile platforms &#124; Chris&#039;s Excellent Adventure In JavaScript</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2011 16:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/#comment-19577</guid>
		<description>[...] iOS in such a way that it will fail silently. This has been widely reported e.g. here, here and here. Obviously without disk caching of the resources, as soon as your app is closed (or at any time [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] iOS in such a way that it will fail silently. This has been widely reported e.g. here, here and here. Obviously without disk caching of the resources, as soon as your app is closed (or at any time [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: somebody</title>
		<link>http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-11132</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/#comment-11132</guid>
		<description>&gt; Still, I can’t understand why this support have been removed for this platform....

maybe because they want to save flash memory life resource?..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>> Still, I can’t understand why this support have been removed for this platform&#8230;.</p>
<p>maybe because they want to save flash memory life resource?..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: mro</title>
		<link>http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-5720</link>
		<dc:creator>mro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/#comment-5720</guid>
		<description>Nice work, Olivier! Full ACK, I don&#039;t understand that either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work, Olivier! Full ACK, I don&#8217;t understand that either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Olivier Poitrey</title>
		<link>http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-5691</link>
		<dc:creator>Olivier Poitrey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/#comment-5691</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve created a lib aimed at giving on-disk caching support back in NSURLCache. You can find it at http://github.com/rs/SDURLCache

Still, I can&#039;t understand why this support have been removed for this platform at the first place. Wouldn&#039;t have been better from Apple to just set disk cache capacity to 0 by default and let developers to decide if he needs it or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve created a lib aimed at giving on-disk caching support back in NSURLCache. You can find it at <a href="http://github.com/rs/SDURLCache" rel="nofollow">http://github.com/rs/SDURLCache</a></p>
<p>Still, I can&#8217;t understand why this support have been removed for this platform at the first place. Wouldn&#8217;t have been better from Apple to just set disk cache capacity to 0 by default and let developers to decide if he needs it or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Von: Paul Lancefield</title>
		<link>http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/comment-page-1/#comment-4950</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lancefield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 12:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.mro.name/2009/07/nsurlcache-joke-iphone/#comment-4950</guid>
		<description>Yep that&#039;s true. The iPhone uses an in memory cache - which is kinda limited and won&#039;t store to &quot;disk&quot; (flash memory). But UIWebView still checks the cache for these pages that can&#039;t be stored. But this behaviour is good because 

1) In memory caching is better than nothing. 

2) You can override the shared cache class to change the behaviours and you could implement your own caching scheme if you really want to and it will then be used by UIWebView. 

3) at any time in the future if the &quot;disk&quot; cache is enabled, UIWebView will get the benefit. So for example, on the iPad you may find &quot;disk&quot; caching enabled by default (I don&#039;t know I haven&#039;t checked - but it&#039;s an example) in which case your iPhone apps will benefit from it when running on the iPad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep that&#8217;s true. The iPhone uses an in memory cache &#8211; which is kinda limited and won&#8217;t store to &#8220;disk&#8221; (flash memory). But UIWebView still checks the cache for these pages that can&#8217;t be stored. But this behaviour is good because </p>
<p>1) In memory caching is better than nothing. </p>
<p>2) You can override the shared cache class to change the behaviours and you could implement your own caching scheme if you really want to and it will then be used by UIWebView. </p>
<p>3) at any time in the future if the &#8220;disk&#8221; cache is enabled, UIWebView will get the benefit. So for example, on the iPad you may find &#8220;disk&#8221; caching enabled by default (I don&#8217;t know I haven&#8217;t checked &#8211; but it&#8217;s an example) in which case your iPhone apps will benefit from it when running on the iPad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

